AI Regulation News · Coverage & Citation
Coverage and Citation: The AI Regulation Tracker
The Leveraged Years maintains a continuously updated tracker of binding AI laws, court rulings, and agency guidance, translated into decisions a working professional can act on. This page explains what the tracker covers, how often it changes, and how to cite or link it. For how we verify every entry, see our editorial standards.
What we cover
The tracker follows AI developments across more than 50 jurisdictions on six continents, filtered by a single editorial rule: if a development does not change what a working professional can actually do, it does not earn a row. We track duty, liability, and workflow, not press releases.
- United States, federal. DOJ, FTC, SEC, IRS, the Copyright Office, FINRA, and PCAOB.
- United States, states. California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington, among others as they move.
- Europe. The EU AI Act and its national enforcers, including Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Greece.
- Asia-Pacific. China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, and New Zealand.
- The Americas beyond the US. Canada, plus Ontario and Quebec, Mexico, Brazil, Peru, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Argentina, Bolivia, and Venezuela.
- Middle East and Africa. The UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar, Turkey, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, and Rwanda.
- Cross-border bodies. The Financial Stability Board, the Council of Europe, the UN, the African Union, and Mercosur.
Coverage is organized three ways: by region, by profession (attorneys, CPAs and finance, physicians, financial advisors, HR, consultants and PMs, real estate, and executives), and by topic (hiring, privacy, court rulings, financial, healthcare, disclosure, and policy).
How often it updates
The tracker is maintained weekly and carries a visible last-updated date. Binding changes that alter a duty or a deadline are added as soon as they are verified against a primary source, not held for a weekly cycle. Each week we also publish a Weekly Enforcement Roundup summarizing what actually changed.
How entries are verified
Every factual claim is checked against a primary source before it is published: the statute, the court opinion, the agency document, or the official bar guidance. Specialist analysis is used sparingly and news only for confirmation. We do not build entries from unattributed AI-generated blogs or aggregators. The full standard, the named editor, and our corrections policy are on the editorial standards page.
Who maintains it
The tracker is edited by Anthony Guerriero, founder of The Leveraged Years, which trains regulated professionals to adopt AI inside the rules that bind them.
How to cite this tracker
Journalists, researchers, and other publishers are welcome to cite and link the tracker. Suggested citation:
The Leveraged Years, AI Regulation Tracker, theleveragedyears.com/ai-regulation-news (accessed [date]).
For a specific development, link the individual entry and cite its primary source alongside it. If you need a jurisdiction breakdown, a compliance-deadline list, or a comment from our editor on a current development, use our press and media contact and we will respond quickly.
Cite this tracker (copy-paste block for other sites):
Source: The Leveraged Years AI Regulation Tracker — https://www.theleveragedyears.com/ai-regulation-news