The GUARD Act: Age Rules for AI Companion Chatbots | TLY

AI Regulation Tracker  /  Legislation pending

US Senate committee advances GUARD Act to force age checks on AI companion chatbots

A bill that cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee would require age verification, minor bans, and non-human disclosure for AI companion chatbots, with civil penalties up to $250,000. It is not yet law, but it signals where federal chatbot rules are heading.

US Senate committee advances GUARD Act to force age checks on AI companion chatbots regulation briefing
The Leveraged Years AI Regulation Tracker

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously on April 30, 2026 to advance the GUARD Act, S. 3062 in the 119th Congress, sending an early federal attempt to regulate AI companion chatbots toward a full Senate vote. A House companion bill was introduced the same day. The measure is not law. It has cleared one committee and now waits for floor action, so the obligations below are proposed, not yet in force.

What the bill would do is specific. Companies that make AI companions available to consumers would have to run reasonable age verification on user accounts. Where a user is found to be a minor under 18, the provider would be barred from giving that user access to an AI companion. The bill also requires clear disclosure that the user is talking to a non-human system that holds no professional credentials, a provision aimed at chatbots that present themselves as friends, therapists, or advisors.

The enforcement teeth

The GUARD Act pairs its duties with real consequences. As drafted, it authorizes civil penalties up to $250,000 per violation, with state attorneys general positioned to bring enforcement actions. It layers on new criminal exposure for providing sexual content to minors through a chatbot. The bill also makes it unlawful to make a chatbot available knowing, or with reckless disregard, that it solicits or coerces minors toward suicide, self-injury, or violence. That combination of state civil enforcement and federal criminal liability is what separates this from voluntary industry safety pledges.

What it does not do yet

Because the bill has only passed committee, none of these requirements currently bind anyone. There is no compliance deadline, no effective date, and the text can still change on the Senate floor or in conference with the House. A reader should treat the $250,000 figure and the age-verification standard as the committee-reported version, not a settled statute. The prudent read is directional: this is where a bipartisan bloc of senators wants federal companion-chatbot policy to go.

Why professionals should track it

The bill reaches a class of product that has spread faster than any rulebook governing it. Any company offering companion or character chatbots, and any vendor building them, would fall inside its scope. For compliance officers, product counsel, and advisors to consumer-technology firms, the operational questions are already concrete. Can the product verify age reliably? Can it exclude minors? Does it disclose its non-human nature at the right moments? Firms that answer those questions now will not be scrambling if the bill becomes law.

The cross-border and cross-jurisdiction angle

The GUARD Act does not stand alone. It parallels reported moves in several jurisdictions, including China, to put guardrails around companion AI and minor safety. For a US firm, the practical point is that a de facto standard is forming across jurisdictions even before any single federal law lands. Building age verification and non-human disclosure into companion products is becoming the baseline expectation regardless of which specific bill crosses the finish line first. Nothing else is currently live at the federal level on companion-chatbot age verification, which is part of why this bill draws attention.

For now, the correct posture is readiness, not compliance. The GUARD Act is a bill that advanced in committee. It is a strong signal of the direction of travel, and it deserves a place on the watch list of anyone whose products or clients touch consumer AI chatbots.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly changed with the GUARD Act on April 30, 2026?

The Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously advanced S. 3062, the GUARD Act, out of committee. That is a procedural step toward a full Senate vote. It did not enact the bill or trigger any obligations. The measure now awaits floor consideration.

Who would the GUARD Act affect if it passes?

Any company that makes AI companion or character chatbots available to consumers, along with the developers and platforms that build them. The duties center on age verification, excluding minors under 18, and disclosing that the bot is not human.

Is the GUARD Act law now?

No. It has passed the Senate Judiciary Committee only and awaits a full Senate vote. A House companion exists. There is no effective date and no compliance deadline, and the text can still change before any enactment.

What penalties does the bill propose?

As drafted, it allows civil penalties up to $250,000 per violation, with state attorney general enforcement, plus new criminal exposure for providing sexual content to minors through a chatbot. These figures reflect the committee-reported version and are not yet binding.

Browse the full AI Regulation News tracker

Informational analysis for working professionals, not legal advice. Confirm how any rule applies to your situation with qualified counsel.