Kazakhstan Digital Code: Automated-Decision Rights | TLY

AI Regulation Tracker  /  New law

Kazakhstan's Digital Code Gives People a Right to Human Review of Automated Decisions From July 2026

Regulatory summary: Kazakhstan's Digital Code, Code No. 255-VIII of January 9, 2026, is a consolidated "digital constitution" that governs digital data and digital objects, and treats artificial intelligence systems as digital objects and digital systems within that environment.

Kazakhstan's new Digital Code (No. 255-VIII) treats artificial intelligence as a digital object inside a single national framework and, in Article 43, gives anyone subject to a fully automated decision the right to be told, to an explanation, and to human review. It takes effect six months after first publication, reported as July 11, 2026.

Primary source

Kazakhstan's Digital Code Gives People a Right to Human Review of Automated Decisions From July 2026 regulation briefing
The Leveraged Years AI Regulation Tracker

Key takeaways

  • Kazakhstan consolidated fragmented digital laws into one code and, for the first time at code level, wrote a general right against fully automated decisions. Article 43 sets non-discrimination, a right to notice, a right to a plain explanation of the decision criteria, and a right to human review where the decision has legal effect. Article 100 ties AI-system quality audits to the separate Law on Artificial Intelligence, including a check for prohibited AI functions. The Code does not itself set the low, medium, and high AI risk tiers or the deepfake-labeling rules that some trackers describe; those sit in the companion AI Law.
  • Operators of automated decision systems in banking, insurance, government services, HR, and platforms serving Kazakh users; compliance and data-protection officers at multinationals active in Kazakhstan; govtech and AI vendors selling into Kazakh public bodies; and counsel advising on automated decisions, redress, and digital sovereignty.
  • Status: Enacted and published.
  • Inventory every automated or AI-assisted decision that touches a person in Kazakhstan, flag the ones that produce legal consequences, and stand up the notice, explanation, and human-review artifacts now, then reconcile them against the separate AI Law's risk tiers.
DateJurisdictionRuleAffected professionalsStatus or effective date
2026-07-09KazakhstanKazakhstan consolidated fragmented digital laws into one code and, for the first time at code level, wrote a general right against fully automated decisions. Article 43 sets non-discrimination, a right to notice, a right to a plain explanation of the decision criteria, and a right to human review where the decision has legal effect. Article 100 ties AI-system quality audits to the separate Law on Artificial Intelligence, including a check for prohibited AI functions. The Code does not itself set the low, medium, and high AI risk tiers or the deepfake-labeling rules that some trackers describe; those sit in the companion AI Law.Operators of automated decision systems in banking, insurance, government services, HR, and platforms serving Kazakh users; compliance and data-protection officers at multinationals active in Kazakhstan; govtech and AI vendors selling into Kazakh public bodies; and counsel advising on automated decisions, redress, and digital sovereignty.Enacted and published. Not yet in force at the time of writing. The Code enters into force on the date fixed by Article 106.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Kazakhstan Digital Code in force now?

Not yet at the time of writing. It was adopted as Code No. 255-VIII on January 9, 2026, and under Article 106 it enters into force six months after first official publication, which legal trackers report as July 11, 2026.

Does the Digital Code give people a right to challenge AI decisions?

Yes, through Article 43. A person subject to a fully automated decision can obtain confirmation that an algorithmic system was used, receive an explanation of the key factors and criteria, and demand review by an authorized human specialist where the decision carries legal consequences or affects their rights.

Does the Digital Code set the low, medium, and high AI risk tiers?

No. The Code's text does not contain the AI risk classification. Article 100 cross-references the separate Law on Artificial Intelligence, which is where the risk tiers and AI-specific prohibitions sit. The two instruments should be read together.

How much does an operator have to reveal about an automated decision?

Article 43 requires an explanation of the key factors and criteria that influenced the decision, but it expressly does not require disclosure of the algorithm, the source code, or information protected as a legally guarded secret.

How is the Digital Code different from Kazakhstan's AI Law?

The Digital Code is the broad framework that treats AI as a digital object and sets automated-decision rights and an AI-audit hook. The AI Law is the dedicated instrument that classifies AI by risk and lists prohibited practices. Compliance requires mapping systems against both.

Browse the full AI Regulation News tracker

Informational analysis for working professionals, not legal advice. Confirm how any rule applies to your situation with qualified counsel.