AI Regulation Tracker / New law
UK Puts the ICO Under a Statutory Duty to Write an AI and Automated Decision-Making Code of Practice
Regulatory summary: Regulations in force since 12 May 2026 require the Information Commissioner to prepare a statutory code of practice on developing and using AI and automated decision-making, with a mandatory children's-data component. The enabling law is live; the code itself is still to be written and is expected in 2027.
Key takeaways
- The UK moved the ICO's AI and automated decision-making guidance from a discretionary work product to a statutory obligation. Before, the ICO published AI and ADM guidance at its own initiative. Now, sections 124A and 124B of the Data Protection Act 2018, exercised through SI 2026/425, require the Commissioner to prepare a code and require that code to address children's data. A statutory code carries more legal weight than ordinary guidance.
- UK controllers and processors using AI or automated decisions on individuals, including recruitment and HR teams running automated screening, lenders and credit providers, insurers doing automated underwriting or pricing, healthcare and life-sciences bodies using clinical or triage AI, and public authorities. Data protection officers, general counsel, and AI governance leads own the response. Vendors selling AI decision tools into the UK will face code-aligned procurement expectations.
- Status: Enabling regulations in force since 12 May 2026.
- Inventory every AI and automated decision system that processes personal data, flag those that make or materially influence decisions about individuals and those touching children's data, and align current practice with the ICO's existing AI and ADM guidance now, so the eventual statutory code is a checkpoint rather than a scramble.
| Date | Jurisdiction | Rule | Affected professionals | Status or effective date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | United Kingdom | The UK moved the ICO's AI and automated decision-making guidance from a discretionary work product to a statutory obligation. Before, the ICO published AI and ADM guidance at its own initiative. Now, sections 124A and 124B of the Data Protection Act 2018, exercised through SI 2026/425, require the Commissioner to prepare a code and require that code to address children's data. A statutory code carries more legal weight than ordinary guidance. | UK controllers and processors using AI or automated decisions on individuals, including recruitment and HR teams running automated screening, lenders and credit providers, insurers doing automated underwriting or pricing, healthcare and life-sciences bodies using clinical or triage AI, and public authorities. Data protection officers, general counsel, and AI governance leads own the response. Vendors selling AI decision tools into the UK will face code-aligned procurement expectations. | Enabling regulations in force since 12 May 2026. The code has not been written. The ICO's related consultation on automated decision-making and profiling guidance closed on 29 May 2026 and feeds into the work. The full statutory code is expected in 2027. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SI 2026/425 in force, and does it regulate my company?
The regulations are in force from 12 May 2026, but they regulate the Information Commissioner, not your company. They impose a duty on the Commissioner to prepare an AI and automated decision-making code of practice. Your organisation's current legal duties still come from the UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the reformed automated decision-making rules.
Does this mean the UK now has an ICO AI code of practice?
Not yet. It means the ICO is now legally required to write one. The code itself has not been drafted or issued. It is expected in 2027 after drafting and consultation.
What makes a statutory code different from the ICO guidance we already follow?
A statutory code prepared under the Data Protection Act 2018 framework must be taken into account by the Commissioner in enforcement and is admissible in legal proceedings. Ordinary guidance does not carry that evidential weight, so the statutory code will be a stronger benchmark.
Why is children's data singled out?
Regulation 2(2) of SI 2026/425 expressly requires the code to include guidance on good practice in processing children's personal data. That signals regulators expect heightened protection where AI or automated decisions involve children, so organisations processing children's data should anticipate stricter expectations.
How does this relate to the automated decision-making changes in the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025?
They are separate. The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 reformed the substantive law on automated decisions and inserted the powers behind this code. The ICO also consulted on automated decision-making and profiling guidance, closing 29 May 2026. SI 2026/425 requires a distinct statutory code that will sit above the guidance and draw on the reformed rules.
Internal links
Sponsored Training
Browse the full AI Regulation News tracker
Informational analysis for working professionals, not legal advice. Confirm how any rule applies to your situation with qualified counsel.