Brazil PL 3066/2025: AI Deepfake Child-CSAM Penalties | TLY

AI Regulation Tracker  /  Bill approved by Senate

Brazil Senate Approves PL 3066/2025 Criminalizing AI and Deepfake Child Abuse Imagery

Regulatory summary: Brazil's Senado Federal approved PL 3066/2025 on July 7, 2026, extending child sexual-abuse-material crimes to content produced or generated by AI and deepfakes even when no real person is depicted, raising penalties and adding an AI aggravator. It now goes to presidential sanction.

The bill treats synthetic and AI-generated child sexual abuse material as a crime even when no real child is depicted, and now awaits presidential sanction.

Primary source

Brazil Senate Approves PL 3066/2025 Criminalizing AI and Deepfake Child Abuse Imagery regulation briefing
The Leveraged Years AI Regulation Tracker

Key takeaways

  • The Senate extended child sexual-abuse-material offenses to representations produced, manipulated, or generated by digital technologies, including artificial intelligence and deepfakes, even when they do not depict a real person. It raised penalties and added a one-third to two-thirds aggravator when AI, deepfakes, or anonymization is used.
  • Criminal-defense and family attorneys, platform trust-and-safety teams, compliance officers, DPOs, EdTech and child-services operators, and content-moderation and detection vendors operating in or serving Brazil
  • Status: Approved by the Senate July 7, 2026.
  • Before sanction, review detection and reporting policies against a definition that covers fully synthetic material, and prepare legal and trust-and-safety teams for a heinous-crime classification that removes leniency benefits
DateJurisdictionRuleAffected professionalsStatus or effective date
2026-07-09BrazilThe Senate extended child sexual-abuse-material offenses to representations produced, manipulated, or generated by digital technologies, including artificial intelligence and deepfakes, even when they do not depict a real person. It raised penalties and added a one-third to two-thirds aggravator when AI, deepfakes, or anonymization is used.Criminal-defense and family attorneys, platform trust-and-safety teams, compliance officers, DPOs, EdTech and child-services operators, and content-moderation and detection vendors operating in or serving BrazilApproved by the Senate July 7, 2026; sent to presidential sanction

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PL 3066/2025 already law in Brazil?

No. The Senado Federal approved the bill on July 7, 2026, and sent it to presidential sanction. It becomes law only after the President sanctions it and the text is officially published. Until then it is an approved bill awaiting sanction, not enacted legislation.

Does the bill criminalize AI-generated abuse imagery that involves no real child?

Yes, under the approved text. It extends the covered crimes to material produced, manipulated, or generated by digital technologies, including artificial intelligence and deepfakes, even when the content does not depict a real person.

What are the new penalty ranges?

According to the Senado Federal, possession offenses move to 3 to 6 years of reclusao plus a fine, and production and distribution offenses move to 4 to 10 years of reclusao plus a fine. A one-third to two-thirds increase applies when AI, deepfakes, or anonymization is used.

What does the hediondo classification mean in practice?

Classifying these offenses as heinous crimes restricts leniency benefits, tightens conditions for provisional release, and lengthens custodial-regime progression requirements. It applies to both consummated and attempted forms under the approved text.

What should trust-and-safety and compliance teams do before sanction?

Review detection and classifier logic so it covers fully synthetic material, confirm that escalation and reporting workflows do not depend on identifying a real victim, and brief legal teams on the penalty increases and heinous-crime classification so they are ready when and if the bill is sanctioned.

Browse the full AI Regulation News tracker

Informational analysis for working professionals, not legal advice. Confirm how any rule applies to your situation with qualified counsel.