AI Regulation Tracker / Regional hub
North America AI Regulation Tracker
New resource: Global AI Compliance Deadline Calendar , 34 primary-source-verified deadlines across 15+ jurisdictions, filter by profession, download the CSV.
The US federal agency actions, US state laws, and Canadian rules and court decisions that change what a professional must do, organized by jurisdiction. We update this as new rules land.
United States, Federal
- Submission of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada to the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat conNot binding. This is a regulator's submission to a Treasury Board Secretariat consultation on reforming the federal Privacy Act. It changes no law and creates no obligation. Any change would
- Ley Num. 163-2026 (P. del S. 441), amending Article 2(c) of Ley Num. 139-2011, Ley del Derecho sobre la PropiaBinding and already in force. The statute states it takes effect immediately upon approval, and the legislature's own record gives 2 August 2026 as both the approval date and the effective d
- Ley Num. 140-2026 (P. de la C. 824), amending Articles 1, 4 and 9 of Ley 40-2024, Ley de CiberseguridadBinding and in force. The act states it takes effect immediately upon approval, and the legislative record gives 22 July 2026 as both the approval date and the effective date.
- Decreto 214/2026, por el que se modifica el Codigo Penal del Estado de Yucatan, en materia de acecho y delitosBinding. This is an enacted amendment to the Yucatan penal code, not a bill or a consultation. Its transitory article provides that it enters into force the day after publication in the stat
- FCC Public Notice DA 26-786, WC Docket No. 18-89, ET Docket No. 21-232, EA Docket No. 21-233Binding and effective now. The Public Notice updates the Covered List maintained under section 2 of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, and under existing rule 47 CFR 2.903(a
- Request for Information (RFI) on Modernizing the National Vulnerability Database in the Age of Artificial InteNon-binding. This is a Notice and Request for Information under 15 U.S.C. 272(b), (c) and 278g-3. It creates no obligation for any organization, and NIST says responses will inform future st
- Letter from Governor Greg Abbott to PUCT Chairman Thomas Gleeson and ERCOT President and CEO Pablo Vegas, AuguA gubernatorial directive to two named recipients, not a statute or a rule. It carries no docket number and no notice-and-comment process. Its operative force depends on what the PUC of Texa
- ERCOT's Requests for Good Cause Exceptions Relating to Batch Zero Deadlines and Status Update on Additional MaThis is a request, not an order. ERCOT asked the Public Utility Commission of Texas to grant good cause exceptions under 16 TAC 25.3(b); the filing includes a Draft Proposed Order the Commis
- Automated Decision-Making Technology and Conversational Artificial Intelligence Service rules, filed with the Not binding. These are proposed draft rules filed with the Secretary of State on August 11, 2026, together with a notice of rulemaking hearing and a statement of basis, authority and purpose
- Enhancing trust in artificial intelligence through increased transparency (ISED discussion paper), and the conA consultation and a discussion paper. Neither binds anybody, neither creates an obligation, and the paper states plainly that whether further action is needed and what form it should take a
- FDA discussion paper on generative AI-enabled medical devicesNon-binding. Comments close 19 October 2026 under docket FDA-2026-N-7874 on a competency-based premarket concept.
- Indiana Supreme Court Order 26S-MS-8, amending Trial Rule 11Since 1 August 2026 an Indiana signature certifies that any cited legal authority is authentic, and the rule expressly covers AI-assisted filings.
- Pennsylvania Executive Order 2026-05 and the GRID RequirementsDEP cannot issue a data center permit until required local approvals are in, and review is deferred for developers that decline the GRID Requirements.
- GOLD EAGLE coordinates AI-enabled vulnerability responseA federal operational clearinghouse under EO 14409, not a new private-sector compliance mandate.
- NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2026-2 on AI recordingThe City Bar ethics committee advises that the default should be not to record, and that consent be obtained from every participant on calls with non-clients.
- X.AI LLC v. Ellison (D. Minn.) TRO deniedA federal judge refused emergency relief on timing grounds, leaving Minnesota's nudification ban undisturbed pending a 19 August preliminary-injunction hearing.
- Elliott v. New York Bariatric Group (Conn. Super. Ct.) prompt injectionA judge sanctioned a filer for hiding white-on-white instructions telling any AI that read the filing to agree with him.
- Leiske v. Kidd (Del. Ch.) GenAI rule to show causeChancery held hallucinated legal propositions raise an inference of a Rule 11(b) violation and made the firm disclose its GenAI policies.
- NIST releases a zero draft on public-facing AI documentationNIST AI 300-1 ipd offers guidance and templates for public-facing AI documentation. Voluntary, and it creates no legal duty.
- OMB gates federal LLM purchases on AI neutrality rulesOMB memo M-26-04 conditions federal large language model purchases on unbiased-AI and neutrality requirements for vendors.
- DOJ deal would curb AI rent-pricing algorithmsA proposed DOJ consent decree with Willow Bridge and RealPage would curb algorithmic rent-pricing.
- USPAP Advisory Opinion 41 guides AI use by appraisersUSPAP Advisory Opinion 41 guides appraisers on using AI while keeping valuation judgment human.
- Publishers sue Google over Gemini AI trainingPublishers and authors file a class action against Google over Gemini AI training on their works.
- NHTSA presses robotaxi makers on first-responder safetyNHTSA presses robotaxi and automated-driving-system makers over first-responder interference and safety.
- US Treasury issues voluntary AI risk framework for financeUS Treasury's voluntary Financial Services AI Risk Management Framework and AI Lexicon set non-binding expectations from February 2026.
- PCAOB spotlight on auditors using generative AIA PCAOB staff Spotlight describes how audit firms use generative AI and the oversight expectations that follow.
- Third Circuit rejects AI decided my case fraud claimThe Third Circuit rejects a litigant's unsupported claim that AI decided his case, in a non-precedential ruling.
- Florida sues OpenAI and Sam Altman personally over ChatGPTFlorida's attorney general sues OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman personally on product-liability and consumer-protection theories.
- Eleventh Circuit refers lawyer over fake AI citationsThe Eleventh Circuit refers a lawyer for discipline over briefs built on fake, AI-generated citations.
- Hawaii signs AI companion disclosure and safety actHawaii enacts SB 3001 and HB 2137, putting disclosure and safety duties on AI companion operators.
- DOJ task force vs state AI lawsA December executive order sets up a DOJ task force to challenge state AI rules.
- Regulation B takes effect July 21ECOA disparate-impact reading changes for AI credit.
- DOL judges: filers own AI-assisted workVerify AI filings; sanctions include dismissal.
- FTC reaches AI voice cloningThe impersonation rule makes AI-faked business and government voices actionable.
- SEC drops its AI rule, not enforcementThe predictive-analytics proposal is withdrawn, but AI-washing cases stand.
- FINRA makes GenAI an exam priorityBroker-dealers must supervise generative AI under Rules 3110, 2210 and 4511.
- IRS: verify AI in tax workCircular 230 duties mean blind reliance on AI is unreasonable reliance.
- No copyright for AI aloneThe Copyright Office and a cert denial keep purely AI-made work unregistrable.
- DOJ opinion on AI hiring liabilityA DOJ opinion attacks the EEOC disparate-impact rule; exposure survives elsewhere.
- Fifth Circuit sanctions an AI briefAI-fabricated citations draw sanctions as more circuits converge.
- The NO FAKES Act likeness rightA pending federal bill would create a digital-replica right against AI clones.
- GUARD Act on companion chatbotsA pending bill would set age checks and disclosure for AI companions.
- CMS pay class for AI clinical softwareA proposed Medicare payment class for AI clinical software, with comments due August 31.
- Publishers seek OpenAI discovery sanctionsNews publishers allege OpenAI spoliation in an SDNY sanctions motion; no court has ruled yet.
- Court: an expert's AI prompts are discoverableIn CLF v. Shell, a Connecticut magistrate held an expert's AI prompts are methodology and discoverable under Rule 26, though the order was stayed.
- AI Note Malpractice: The Review Window That Protects YouPlaintiff lawyers are arguing a reasonable review window for AI note errors.
- AI Privilege After Heppner: Keep Claude Chats ProtectedA federal judge ruled a defendant's Claude chats were not privileged.
- HUD Cut AI Housing Rules. Your Bias Liability StayedHUD is rescinding its disparate-impact regulation, but the Fair Housing Act still creates liability for biased AI tenant screening.
- AI Scribe Wiretap Lawsuits: What Physicians Owe NowCIPA wiretap suits hit health systems over AI scribe recordings.
- Consumer AI Privacy Terms and the Confidentiality TrapAn updated consumer AI privacy policy lets the vendor disclose data to law enforcement on a good-faith belief, no court order.
- AI Regulation for AttorneysAI regulation for attorneys: court sanctions, bar ethics guidance, standing orders, and privilege rulings that change how lawyers use AI on filings.
- CFPB AI Fair-Lending Rollback: What Still Binds LendersThe CFPB withdrew its AI adverse-action circulars and paused exams.
- Kazakhstan Digital Code: Automated-Decision RightsKazakhstan's Digital Code No.
- CMS MIPS Now Credits Tracking AI Patient-Safety EventsA new CMS MIPS improvement activity credits clinicians for tracking AI-attributable patient-safety events.
- EEOC AI Hiring Rules: New Enforcement Plan and DOJ OpinionThe EEOC's FY2025-2029 enforcement plan and a June 2026 DOJ opinion shifted federal AI hiring risk, but NYC, Illinois, and California bias-audit laws still bind employers.
- FDA Guidance: When Clinical AI Is a Regulated Medical DeviceFDA's revised guidance sets a four-criteria test for when clinical AI is a regulated medical device.
- FINRA 2026: AI Agent Controls and Deepfake ID RulesFINRA's 2026 oversight report puts AI agents and GenAI deepfakes in writing.
- FTC Targets AI Accuracy Under Section 5 DeceptionThe FTC proposed a policy statement on July 7 warning that degrading or suppressing AI accuracy can be a Section 5 deception.
- Federal Contractors: The New AI Procurement ClausesOMB M-25-22 AI contract flowdowns are live, and a GSA LLM-safeguarding clause is proposed with comments due Aug 3.
- How the IRS Uses AI to Pick Partnership AuditsThe IRS runs two AI models to prioritize which large partnerships get audited, and it is expanding AI in enforcement.
- IRS ETAAC 2026 Report: AI Transparency Rules for Tax ProsThe IRS ETAAC 2026 report urges the agency to disclose how it uses AI.
- NAIC AI Exam Pilot: What Insurance Regulators Now DemandThe NAIC's 12-state AI exam pilot runs March to September 2026.
- NAIC AI Model Bulletin: What Insurers Owe NowThe NAIC AI Model Bulletin sets state rules for AI in underwriting, pricing, and claims.
- NAIC AI Model Rules: The Underwriter Compliance ChecklistMore than half of US states adopted the NAIC AI model bulletin.
- NIST Builds an AI Profile for Critical InfrastructureNIST opened work on an AI Risk Management Framework profile for critical infrastructure covering energy, water and transport.
- NIST and ISO 42001: A Single AI Governance StackA crosswalk on NIST's AI Resource Center maps the AI Risk Management Framework to ISO/IEC 42001, the first certifiable AI management standard.
- AI Regulation for PhysiciansAI regulation for physicians: AI scribe consent and wiretap risk, note malpractice, FDA decision support, and prior-authorization rules for clinical AI.
- Shadow AI Triggered the First SEC 8-K: Boards Take NoteAn employee's unsanctioned AI use triggered the first SEC 8-K of its kind.
- TAKE IT DOWN Act Is Live: Sites Owe a 48-Hour TakedownFederal enforcement of the TAKE IT DOWN Act began May 19, 2026.
- White House Frontier AI Model Release Standards ExplainedA June 2 executive order lets the US government preview frontier AI models for 30 days before release.
United States, States
- Louisiana Act 782 targets specified AI-created images of another personA targeted criminal-law amendment effective August 1, 2026, with stated provider and recipient exclusions. It is not a general AI law.
- Louisiana Act 892 adds AI images to CSAM definitionsA narrow amendment to existing definitions, effective August 1, 2026. It is not a general AI law.
- California large-AI initiative enters signature-gatheringA proposed ballot initiative, not enacted law. Its 3 August 2026 signature deadline does not create a current company duty.
- California child-safety AI proposal enters circulationA proposed initiative in circulation, not enacted law. County election officials must receive signatures by August 10, 2026 for the current qualification track.
- Connecticut Supreme Court sanctions AI citation errorsA case-specific sanctions order requires additional CLE, two $1,000 donations and compliance reporting after approximately seven erroneous and unverified AI-assisted citations.
- Idaho enacts the Conversational AI Safety ActSigned 31 March 2026 as Session Law Chapter 249 and operative 1 July 2027. The floor amendment added purpose-limited exclusions and redefined operator as anyone who makes the service public.
- xAI sues to block Minnesota nudification lawA pre-enforcement complaint filed 27 July 2026. No court has ruled and no injunction has issued.
- Washington board moves to say only humans may practise medicineTwo draft documents out for comment would reach that result by board interpretation, with discipline exposure under RCW 18.130.180.
- New Jersey bans surveillance pricing on necessitiesThe Fair Price Protection Act bars using personal data to set individualised prices for identical necessities.
- Mississippi adopts the NAIC AI model bulletin with no runwayBulletin 2026-9 states no transition period, so the AI governance expectation is live on issuance for carriers writing in the state.
- Iowa adopts binding AI rules for judges and court staffChapter 27 bars judges from deferring to AI work product and gates any AI tool touching judicial case information. Effective 1 January 2027.
- Hawaii Act 247 creates consent liability for AI digital imitationsEffective on approval, with civil liability up to $25,000 per advertisement and a separate Attorney General channel for widespread harm.
- Louisiana requires AI-deepfake disclosure in election adsLouisiana HB 459 requires disclosure of AI-generated deepfakes in election and campaign advertising.
- Illinois bars AI-scored public-school teacher evaluationsIllinois SB 2909 bars AI from scoring public-school teacher evaluations without human judgment.
- Tennessee: AI is not a therapistSB 1580 bars AI from posing as a mental health professional, with a private action.
- Washington: no AI-only denialsSB 5395 bars AI as the sole basis to deny prior authorization.
- Illinois WOPR Act bars AI therapyAI cannot deliver therapy or write treatment plans without a licensed clinician.
- Oregon: companion rules with a PRASB 1546 adds companion-AI duties backed by a private right of action, in 2027.
- California SB 243 companion safetyCompanion-chatbot operators face disclosure duties and a $1,000-per-violation suit.
- Maryland: report AI-aided denialsInsurers must report quarterly whether AI drove each coverage denial.
- Nebraska Conversational AI Safety ActOperators must disclose AI, protect minors and run crisis protocols by 2027.
- New Jersey criminalizes deepfakesDeceptive AI media for an unlawful purpose is a third-degree crime.
- Oklahoma: districts need AI policiesEvery school district must adopt a written AI policy before 2027-28.
- California ADMT hiring dutiesCCPA rules add notice and opt-out duties for AI in hiring, from 2027.
- Colorado ADMT and chatbot rulemakingProposed rules were filed with the Secretary of State on August 11, 2026 and formal comments run to October 26, 2026, or the last day of the hearing if it continues past that date. The rules are not adopted; they take effect January 1, 2027.
- New Jersey FAIR Act on rent-setting AIA bill to ban algorithmic rent-setting and coordination, sent to the governor.
- New Jersey Kids Code design dutiesRecommendation systems, minors' data and ad targeting face new design duties, awaiting the governor.
- Illinois SB 315 frontier-AI auditsThe first US state to require independent safety audits of large frontier AI developers, from January 1, 2027.
- Virginia HB 481 bars AI-only denialsA licensed physician must review and approve every prior-authorization denial, blocking AI-only denials.
- Connecticut CART Act on AI hiringUsing an AI hiring tool is no defense to a bias claim, with duties from October 1, 2026.
- Rhode Island AI clinical-note disclosureProviders must tell patients when AI documents a visit and review the note for accuracy.
- Rhode Island S2195 companion crisis rulesAI companion bots must run crisis protocols, disclose non-human status and report to the AG, from January 1, 2027.
- Vermont Act 156 limits AI therapyAI may not independently provide mental health services; AI-only therapy is unprofessional conduct.
- PA board sues Character.AI as unlicensed doctorPennsylvania's State Board of Medicine sued Character.AI, alleging a bot posed as a licensed psychiatrist with a fake license number.
- AI Staged Photos Now a Misdemeanor Risk: AB 723California AB 723 took effect Jan 1, 2026: altered listing images need a conspicuous disclosure plus a link to the original.
- AI Employment Law Patchwork: HR Survival GuideA Dec 2025 federal EO targets state AI laws while Illinois, California, and Colorado push ahead.
- 4 States Now Regulate AI Hiring: One Workflow to ComplyIllinois, Texas, Colorado, and Connecticut each regulate AI hiring differently.
- Federal AVM Rule in Force: Five Standards for AI Home ValuatSix federal agencies set quality-control standards for the AI models that value homes, effective Oct 1, 2025, including a fair-lending factor.
- California AB 2148: Teachers Must Be Human, Not AICalifornia's AB 2148 defines a public-school employee or contractor as a natural person, so districts cannot put an AI system in a human educator role.
- California's AI Layoff Order: New WARN Act TripwiresCalifornia's Executive Order N-6-26 tells agencies to expand WARN Act, severance, and training rules for AI-driven layoffs.
- California Bar Maps Agentic AI to Your DutyCalifornia's State Bar approved its first agentic AI guidance on May 14, 2026.
- California Bar Wants You to Verify Every AI OutputCalifornia's State Bar proposed rules requiring lawyers to verify every AI output and disclose its use to clients.
- California FEHA AI Bias Audit DefenseCalifornia's FEHA AI decision rules took effect Oct 1, 2025 and make an anti-bias audit a legal defense.
- California SB 53 Frontier AI Act Is Now in ForceCalifornia SB 53 makes large frontier AI developers publish safety frameworks and report critical incidents within 15 days.
- Colorado HB 26-1195: New AI Limits in TherapyColorado's HB 26-1195, effective August 12, bars AI from therapeutic communication without real-time clinician oversight and requires written consent to record.
- Colorado's New AI Law: Disclosure Duties and Trade SecreColorado replaced its 2024 AI Act with SB 26-189, a disclosure-based ADMT law effective Jan 2027.
- Colorado AI Act: Enforcement Stayed as of June 30, 2026Colorado's AI Act enforcement is stayed as of June 30, 2026 after xAI sued and DOJ intervened.
- Federal vs State AI Fight Hits Your Insurance PremiumsA federal push to preempt state AI rules collides with the state laws governing AI pricing and underwriting.
- Federal vs State AI Law: What Preempts What in 2026Can a federal AI order override state statutes?
- Florida AI Filing Rule 2.515 and the June SanctionsFlorida Rule 2.515 took effect June 15, 2026.
- Illinois AI Safety Measures Act (SB0315): Who It BindsIllinois enacted the AI Safety Measures Act on July 6.
- Illinois HB 3773: Copy-Paste AI Disclosure TemplateIllinois HB 3773 is live.
- Illinois HB 3773: AI Employment Notice Rules WithdrawnIllinois' AI employment notice rules were withdrawn June 2, 2026, but the law still binds employers.
- NY Court Fines Firm $2,500 for AI Fake Case CitationsNew York's Appellate Division, Second Department is now sanctioning AI hallucinated citations, including a $2,500 penalty in June 2026.
- NY Part 161: The New AI Verification Rule for LitigatorsNew York's Part 161 AI rule took effect June 1, 2026.
- Texas SB 815 Bars Automated AI Utilization DenialsTexas SB 815 bars automated AI from making utilization-review denials without a human reviewer.
- Texas TRAIGA HB 149: AI Disclosure Duty in HealthcareTexas TRAIGA (HB 149) requires disclosing AI use in clinical care.
- Utah Lets AI Renew Prescriptions Without a DoctorUtah approved the first state pilot letting an AI renew prescriptions.
- Arizona: AI-only medical necessity denials barredArizona HB 2175 requires a medical director to review AI-flagged medical necessity denials rather than let the model decide alone.
- Connecticut: CTDPA AI profiling opt-out rightsConnecticut SB 1295 phases in CTDPA opt-out rights over profiling and automated decisions that produce legal or similar effects.
- New York: hyperscale AI data center moratoriumNew York Executive Order 62 pauses approvals of hyperscale AI data centers pending an energy and water impact review.
- Washington: AI deepfake likeness lawWashington SSB 5886 gives people personality rights against forged AI digital likenesses used without consent.
- New York: ad disclosure of AI synthetic performersNew York S8420A requires advertisers to disclose when a synthetic AI performer stands in for a human in ads.
- Georgia: AI-only health insurance denials barred in 2027Georgia SB 444 will require human review before AI can drive a health insurance coverage denial starting in 2027.
- Washington: AI companion chatbot safety law for 2027Washington HB 2225 sets 2027 safety and disclosure duties for AI companion chatbots aimed at consumers and minors.
- Maryland: AI deepfake identity fraud criminalizedMaryland SB 8 criminalizes the use of AI deepfakes to commit identity fraud, effective in 2026.
- California: AI training-data transparency now liveCalifornia AB 2013 now requires developers to publish documentation on the data used to train generative AI systems.
- Utah: human judgment in AI prior authorizationUtah SB 319 requires human clinical judgment and disclosure when AI is used in prior authorization decisions.
- New Jersey: disparate-impact rules for AI hiringNew Jersey DCR rules at NJAC 13:16 extend disparate-impact liability to AI-driven hiring and employment tools.
- Washington: AI content provenance disclosure law for 2027Washington HB 1170 sets 2027 provenance and disclosure duties for AI-generated content.
- Texas: AG gains TRAIGA enforcement powerTRAIGA enforcement authority takes effect, giving the Texas Attorney General power to act against unlawful AI uses.
- California: AI Transparency Act phases inCalifornia AB 853 AI Transparency Act duties begin phasing in from August, adding provenance and labeling obligations.
- Colorado: insurer AI bias rules extended to auto and healthColorado extends its insurer AI governance and anti-bias testing rules to auto and health lines.
- New York: DFS frontier AI cyber risk warningNew York DFS guidance warns regulated financial firms to address frontier AI cybersecurity and social-engineering risk.
- Michigan: DIFS AI program expectations for finance firmsMichigan DIFS issues a bulletin setting governance and oversight expectations for AI systems at regulated finance firms.
- Florida: AI data center utility and water lawFlorida SB 484 sets utility, siting, and water-use rules for large AI data centers.
- Virginia: no AI as sole decision-maker in criminal justiceVirginia bars AI from acting as the sole decision-maker in criminal justice determinations, requiring a human in the loop.
United States, Additional Coverage
- FDA names a Division of Artificial Intelligence in CDERA reorganisation notice places a Division of Artificial Intelligence inside CDER's Office of Medical Policy, beside real-world evidence analytics rather than product review. It is an org chart and creates no obligation.
- Tenth Circuit publishes its AI citation standardA published Tenth Circuit opinion holds that fabricated citations breach Rule 46.5 and are sanctionable at the court's discretion, while declining to sanction in this case.
- Third Circuit revives AI price-fixing claims against casinosA precedential Third Circuit ruling holds that competitors feeding non-public pricing and occupancy data into one vendor's AI engine can plausibly plead a Sherman Act section 1 conspiracy. It is a pleading standard, not a finding of liability.
- Illinois sets $1,500 per false AI citationThe First District fined an attorney $15,000 for 10 false citations, priced every type of falsehood at the same rate, and said fines must keep rising until they deter.
- Four appellate courts, four remedies for pro se AI citationsOregon, Tennessee, Florida and Illinois reached four different outcomes in nine days for the same conduct by self-represented litigants.
- AI-Run Ransomware Is Here. Your Duty Isn't NewResearchers documented the first ransomware run end to end by an AI agent.
- AI Chatbot Disclosure Laws: What Binds Your BusinessA Tennessee ban took effect July 1 and headlines called it a wave.
- AI Court Rules: Sanctions, Standing Orders and Filing DutiesAI court rules tracked for attorneys: sanctions for fabricated citations, standing orders, and what every AI-assisted filing now has to prove.
- AI Disclosure Rules: When You Must Label AI-Generated WorkAI disclosure rules across professions: when altered media, AI content, and automated decisions legally require a label or notice, and how to comply.
- AI Healthcare Compliance: Scribes, Consent and the Note You SignAI healthcare compliance for physicians: ambient scribe consent and wiretap risk, the malpractice review window on AI notes, and Medicare prior-auth.
- AI Hiring Laws: Notice, Bias Audits and Vendor LiabilityAI hiring laws tracked for HR and employment counsel: applicant notice rules, bias audits, vendor liability, layoff disclosure, and surveillance limits.
- AI Laws by Profession: What Your Duty Is NowA guide to AI regulation organized by profession: lawyers, doctors, financial advisers, insurers, HR, marketers, developers and compliance.
- AI and Your Stamp: What Architects and Engineers Still OweYour professional boards did not write a new AI rule because the old one already governs it.
- Ambient AI Scribes: The Regulatory Vacuum and Accuracy RiskAmbient AI scribes are scaling fast with no dedicated FDA or CMS oversight.
- The Anthropic Settlement and the Fair Use LineA federal judge ruled training AI on lawfully acquired books can be fair use, but hoarding pirated copies is not.
- Atlassian to Train Rovo on Customer Data: Opt OutFrom August 17, 2026 Atlassian may use Jira, Confluence and JSM data to train its Rovo AI.
- Bartz v. Anthropic: A $1.5B AI Copyright BenchmarkAnthropic's 1.5 billion dollar author-class settlement sets a public per-work benchmark for AI copyright exposure.
- Brazil's STJ Bars AI-Generated Report as EvidenceBrazil's top court excluded an AI-made report as unreliable criminal evidence, an early high-court signal that counsel must verify AI output before filing.
- Connecticut SB 5 Is Law: AI Hiring Rules Hit Oct 1, 2026Connecticut SB 5 (signed May 27, 2026) makes employers disclose AI hiring tools and bars using them as a bias defense.
- Connecticut AI Layoff Disclosure RuleConnecticut SB 5 makes employers state whether AI drove a layoff on the WARN filing starting Oct 1, 2026.
- Corrections Policy | AI Regulation News by The Leveraged YearsOur corrections policy: if a source changes, a date shifts, or we get something wrong, we update the page and note the correction clearly with the date.
- AI Regulation for CPAs and Finance Professionals | TrackerAI regulation for CPAs and finance: PCAOB QC 1000, SEC and RIA AI governance, FINRA guidance, and Circular 230 duties for accountants and advisors.
- Editorial Standards | AI Regulation News by The Leveraged YearsHow AI Regulation News is sourced, reviewed, corrected, and kept independent.
- SaaS Contracts as Hidden AI Training LicensesAnalysis reports most AI contracts claim data rights beyond service delivery, and few offer third-party IP protection.
- AI Regulation for Executives and Boards | Governance TrackerAI regulation for executives and boards: federal versus state preemption, EU AI Act transparency duties, fiduciary AI governance, and shadow-AI risk.
- Is Fable 5 Coming Back? The Rumors and What It Did BestIs Fable 5 coming back? As of June 26, 2026 it is still suspended and serving zero traffic.
- Getty v. Stability AI: Trademark Risk in AI OutputThe England and Wales High Court found trademark infringement where AI output reproduced Getty watermarks, and Getty won permission to appeal.
- How We Use AI | AI Regulation News by The Leveraged YearsOur AI use disclosure: regulatory analysis is drafted with AI assistance and verified by human editors.
- AI Regulation for HR and Employment | People Teams TrackerAI regulation for HR and employment: Illinois HB 3773 disclosure, NLRB surveillance limits, California FEHA bias audits, WARN, and AI vendor liability.
- India IT Rules: Mandatory Labels for AI-Generated ContentIndia's amended IT Rules require AI-generated content to carry permanent provenance metadata and make large platforms verify user AI declarations.
- Indiana HB 1271: AI Downcoding Now Needs a Human ReviewIndiana's HB 1271 took effect July 1. Insurers cannot use AI as the sole basis to downcode a claim without a human reading the record, and must disclose AI use.
- Iowa HF 2635: AI Alone Can't Deny Prior AuthIowa's HF 2635 bars AI as the sole basis for a prior-authorization denial and requires a same-specialty reviewer.
- Ireland AI Bill: Enforcers and Fines Up to 7%Ireland's AI Bill names the Data Protection Commission, Central Bank and CCPC as market-surveillance authorities, with fines up to 7% of global turnover.
- The End of Silent AI: New Insurance ExclusionsNew ISO endorsements let insurers exclude losses arising out of generative AI at every liability renewal, and cyber carriers are adding AI sublimits.
- Maine LD 2082 Limits AI in Mental Health CareMaine LD 2082 restricts AI in therapeutic communication and adds consent rules for mental health care.
- Medicare WISeR: Win AI Prior Auth Appeals FasterMedicare WISeR runs prior auth through AI in 6 states.
- Mexico Copyright Law: Consent to Use a Voice in AIMexico's Federal Copyright Law reform requires express written authorization, with pay, to use a person's image or voice in any AI system.
- Mississippi AI Sanctions: Two Lawyers Barred Two YearsJudge Aycock barred two lawyers two years and fined all four for AI-fabricated citations.
- Missouri SB 1019: AI Cannot Pose as a TherapistMissouri's SB 1019 would bar AI from claiming to be a mental health professional, enforced under the state's consumer-fraud law with civil penalties.
- Nevada AB 406: AI Barred From Direct Mental Health CareNevada AB 406 bars AI from providing mental or behavioral health care directly to patients and bans AI therapist claims.
- California Sanctions a Lawyer Over AI-Fabricated CitationsA published California appeals court fined a lawyer $1,500 and referred him to the State Bar for AI-fabricated case quotes; the duty to verify AI output is personal.
- Ninth Circuit AI Sanctions Ruling: What It MeansThe Ninth Circuit made AI-hallucination sanctions precedential on June 3, 2026.
- NLRB on AI Meeting Bots and SurveillanceThe NLRB treats intrusive AI surveillance and automated management as Section 7 risks.
- NYC Local Law 144 Audit: AI Hiring Enforcement GapsA NYC Comptroller audit found Local Law 144 AI hiring enforcement is failing.
- NY S9584: AI Video and Immersive Listing Disclosure RulesNew York's pending S9584 would require disclosure of AI edits to listing video and virtual tours.
- OMB AI Memos at One Year: What Agencies Must Do NowMore than a year after OMB's M-25-21 and M-25-22, federal AI work has moved to execution.
- ONC HTI-5 Proposes Rolling Back AI Model CardsONC HTI-5 proposes scaling back AI model-card transparency for certified health IT.
- OWASP: Treat Prompt Injection as a Structural FlawOWASP's agentic-AI security report catalogs real CVEs and names prompt injection the top threat, framing it as a structural flaw.
- PCAOB QC 1000: Document Your AI Before DecemberPCAOB QC 1000 takes effect December 15, 2026 and now covers AI tools.
- Pennsylvania HB 2006: AI Companion Chatbot Safety BillPennsylvania's HB 2006 would make companion-chatbot operators build self-harm and crisis-routing safeguards.
- Press and Media | AI Regulation News by The Leveraged YearsPress and media contact for AI Regulation News.
- Publisher | AI Regulation News by The Leveraged YearsThe Leveraged Years publishes AI Regulation News: binding AI rules translated into workflow decisions for regulated professionals.
- Korea's AI Image-Matching Mandate Now Covers PhotosFrom July 1, 2026 about 80 Korean platforms must auto-scan every uploaded image against a DNA reference database and block matches.
- Rhode Island Bars AI From Therapy Decisions: 2026 LawTwo Rhode Island laws (June 23, 2026) make AI chatbots flag suicide risk and bar AI from therapeutic decisions without a licensed clinician and consent.
- The 3 AI Files an SEC Examiner Now Asks RIAs ForSEC exams now ask RIAs for AI governance files: an acceptable-use policy, vendor oversight, and a human-review log.
- Singapore PDPC: Privacy Duties for Generative AISingapore's PDPC draft advisory maps PDPA duties across generative-AI development, deployment and procurement, including provider-to-deployer safeguards.
- The UN Launches Its First Global AI Governance ForumThe UN opened its first Global Dialogue on AI Governance and a 40-member Independent Scientific Panel.
- Weekly AI Enforcement Roundup: Rules That Changed DutyThe AI rules, rulings, and enforcement actions that changed what a licensed professional owes, updated weekly with a primary source on every entry.
- Wisconsin Act 69: AI Real Estate Photo DisclosureWisconsin Act 69 requires disclosing AI-altered real estate listing photos.
- The Workday Ruling and Your AI Hiring LiabilityJune 2026 Mobley v. Workday rulings treat the AI hiring vendor as your agent, so the employer wears the bias.
Canada
- Ontario requires AI disclosure in public job postingsOntario's ESA amendments require employers to disclose when AI is used to screen or assess applicants in publicly advertised job postings.
- BC privacy commissioner orders Richmond AI camera removalBritish Columbia's privacy commissioner ordered Richmond to remove AI-enabled public-safety cameras that breached FIPPA.
- OSFI sets sound practices for generative and agentic AICanada's OSFI issues sound practices for generative and agentic AI cyber and operational resilience.
- BC Provincial Court urges verifying AI before filingThe BC Provincial Court tells lawyers and self-represented litigants to verify AI output before filing.
- No AI Act; duties via privacy lawAIDA died, so duties flow from PIPEDA and the Treasury Board ADM directive.
- OSFI E-23 model riskFederally regulated financial institutions face model-risk expectations for AI and ML.
- Quebec Law 25 automated decisionsSection 12.1 sets AI transparency duties under Law 25's penalty regime.
- Ontario's binding AI directiveA binding government directive governs Ontario public-sector AI use.
- Ontario regulators set AI principlesThe IPC and OHRC set five responsible-AI principles across the supply chain.
- Health Canada on ML devicesGuidance sets change-control expectations for machine-learning medical devices.
- Ontario physicians own AI useCPSO advice keeps doctors accountable for AI in clinical care under PHIPA.
- Competition Bureau on AI-washingExisting law reaches AI marketing claims and algorithmic pricing.
- Accountants stay accountableCPA Ontario guidance keeps accountants answerable for AI-assisted work.
- Lawyer AI duties in CanadaLegal Aid Ontario makes roster lawyers attest to following AI guidance.
- Canada Courts: No Excuse for AI-Faked CitationsCanadian tribunals set a record AI cost sanction and ruled a lawyer owns a contractor's AI hallucinations even after an internal AI ban.
- Canada Finds OpenAI's ChatGPT Data Scraping ImproperFour Canadian regulators found OpenAI's scraping to train ChatGPT inappropriate, requiring express consent for sensitive data.
- Ontario: tribunal orders 31150 AI hallucination costsAn Ontario tribunal ordered 31,150 dollars in costs after a party filed AI-hallucinated citations in the Mazaheri matter.
Informational analysis for working professionals, not legal advice. Confirm how any rule applies to your situation with qualified counsel.